Loading ...
Naughty-Naughty; Spanky-Spanky, Ta-Ta-Ta-Ta-TEASE ME, Mr. G.O.P. Congressman…
As shocking as this will be to some of you, one of California’s prominent lawmakers was busted bragging about having kinky, premarital sex with a woman and this time, it wasn’t even a Democrat — it was one of those extremely rare occurences involving a member of the “Party Of Values” this time (Talking Points Memo — “TPM“). Oh, well — at least it was a hetrosexual tryst this time, not that I’m suggesting other varieties of trysts are bad, I’m just saying I’m glad it wasn’t another one of those “Ted Haggard” sorts of episodes this time around…
From TPM Muckracker:
GOP Lawmaker’s Graphic Sex-Bragging Caught On Tape
Zachary RothWe’ve all seen those stories where a careless politician gets a little too candid when speaking into a hot mic. But this one’s really in a whole different league.
Michael Duvall is a conservative Republican state representative from Orange County, California. While waiting for the start of a legislative hearing in July, the 54-year-old married father of two and family values champion [emphasis, mine] began describing, for the benefit of a colleague seated next to him, his ongoing affairs with two different women. In very graphic detail.
For instance:
She wears little eye-patch underwear. So, the other day she came here with her underwear, Thursday. And so, we had made love Wednesday–a lot! And so she’ll, she’s all, ‘I am going up and down the stairs, and you’re dripping out of me!’ So messy!
(Snip!)
So, I am getting into spanking her. Yeah, I like it. I like spanking her. She goes, ‘I know you like spanking me.’ I said, ‘Yeah! Because you’re such a bad girl!’
Click on the link above to see the video coverage of the incident. And yes, this one’s going to get filed under “OOPS!” as you could imagine.
Look, I’m not going to play “politics” with this one — well, SORT of not going to. I’m a Liberal with a capital “L” and it sounds to me as if this Cali-Congresscritter had a night loaded with the brand of fun I might personally be partial to, especially after a few “cold ones”. On the other hand, I’m not a politician, this is NOT one of my lobbyists and I don’t go around bashing on those who make human mistakes — that is — unless, of course, they attempt to portray themselves as “better than that”. FORMER Congressman Michael Duvall has touted himself as a “Family Values Champion”. OOPS. Let’s call this another case of “voter disenfranchisement”, shall we? Let’s make it a jailable offense, too, while we’re at it. THINK about it — how many people who voted for this man on this “Family Values” crappola would have done so had they known he was an adulterous, wonderfully kinky jackass? Prison bars for ALL of these dorks, I say. Oh well…
Welcome to the rapidly-growing G.O.P. Hall Of Shame, Sir. Oh, and welcome to the unemployment line as well.
One last IRRESISTABLE Snippet before I leave the rest up to you all:
Duvall has “blasted” efforts to promote gay marriage, and got a 100 percent score from the Capitol Resource Institute, which describes its mission as to “educate, advocate, protect, and defend family-friendly policies in the California state legislature”. In March, a spokeswoman for the group called Duvall “a consistent trooper for the conservative causes,” adding that “for the last two years, he has voted time and time again to protect and preserve family values in California.”
WOW. How shocking.
***
A couple of other blogger reax: Ed Morrissey of Hot Air (Right) offers a surprisingly sane commentary; (THE) Alan Colmes of Liberaland gives ‘em the hell he deserves…
ANOTHER PAIR OF CONGRESSMEN COVER THEMSELVES WITH GLORY « The Sports Pig’s Blog // Sep 10, 2009 at 6:36 AM
[...] TWO affairs he’s having. Duvall described one young lobbyists he’s screwing as having “little eye-patch underwear.” Since Duvall’s a scumbag, he had the tape pulled from YouTube for “copyright” [...]
Those republicans, you gotta love ‘em. It’s pretty clear most hot women do!
What is it about the republican party that attracts all the studs, the guys with enough testosterone and sex drive for three people, and the women who love them?
Dang. Just one of those quirks of nature.
Yeah, those studs in the Republican Party have a lot of testosterone for women…and other men in bathroom stalls (Larry Craig)…and teenage boys (Mark Foley).
@Fandb, Three things… 1. John Edwards 2. Bill Clinton 3. John F. Kennedy. One of these dated Marilyn Monroe.
It’s not a Republican thing. It’s a “powerful men” thing. Women are attracted to powerful men with lots of money. There’s a shocker.
@Alabama Moderate, OK, I’ll buy the JFK and Bill Clinton thing, but John Edwards????? Come on now, be real!
JFK and Bill Clinton were closet fiscal conservatives anyway.
@Alabama Moderate, Yep, some things never really change. But it would seem that those darned anti-sex consevratives are the only ones getting any.
@Joe Lovell, LMFAO!
I’ve always been curious about this.
Do you have to be gay…to champion gay rights?
Do you have to be sick to champion health care?
Do you have to be retarded to root for special olympics?
Do you have to be Religious to demand prayer in school?
Do you have to be a soldier to demand war?
Do you have to be a woman to champion abortion?
do you have to drive a motorcycle to champion helmet laws?
Do you have to not drink to champion DWI laws?
Do you have to live in Chicago to root for the bears?
I mean I could go on and on and on. Because if thats the case then there are very few people in the government that can vote on any bill at any given time.
I vote for a candidate based upon what he promises to do. Al Gore promises to cure global warming despite making a mess of the globe himself. Is he disingenious? Do you not believe he wants to solve global warming just because hes a big time carbon footprinter?
Congressmen should have terms limited – no more career politicians « Laronski Report // Sep 10, 2009 at 5:26 PM
[...] If it’s not the affairs, it’s the bribes, corruption and arrests that mind us that these publicly elected people are not serving our best interest and they’re not morally right. Who wants to be represented by an adulterer or know that the person that’s supposed to be representing you is being bought by lobbyists to server their needs and not yours. [...]
You have to ask two qustions about Heidi Dejong Barsuglia. What did she have to gain and what did she have lose. Taking the second question; she would probably lose her husband, devastate her family and children, lose all possibility for employment, and lastly could do prison time for bribing an assemblyman. Now what did she have to gain; Duvall’s vote, no he voted 100% with the Republicans no need to buy his vote, money no bribery goes toward the politician not to the lobbyist, an appointment to a government position, no she take a very large cut in pay, a great night with a stud, hell no Duvall is a fat, gross old man. So what exactly did she have to gain by sleeping with this man?