Loading ...Sir Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton: “To HELL With The Electoral College; To HELL With The Delegates And Superdelegates — The MOB Says I’m IN Like FLYNN!”
Hillary has already gone on the record to express her disdain for the Electoral College. That means, in Hillary’s “Perfect Utopia” politicians would only have to campaign in in Florida, California and New York City; win the voters over in those select segments of America by pandering to their local wants, needs and desires, and “Screw the rest of the country and THEIR wants, needs and desires… who cares? I’m president now.” “Let the MOBS decide the direction in which our country goes”, says Sir Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton.
On “paper” and at first [shallow] thought, the idea of an “up-and-down-vote” style of Democracy sounds like a good idea. On the other hand, in a PURE “Democracy”, to use an analogy; you’ve got five gap-toothed neocons with nothing but sexual acts on their minds and one pretty gal. One gap-toothed neocon raises a vote to rape the cutie-pie, the other four quickly raise theirs, too, and it’s a five-to-one vote — “Rape The Cutie!!!“. All nice and “legal”, too, that is; in Hillary’s world. Luckily, our Founding Fathers and the Democratic Party (as hard as this might be to swallow) — were much SMARTER than Sir Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton on the subject of a “Mob Rules Styled Democracy“. Much smarter people; much larger thinkers than Hillary recognized the DANGER of this form of “gub’mint” and the Founding Fathers unanimously agreed a Democratic Republic; “representative” form of “gub’mint” might — just MIGHT be the better way to go.
But NOPE — Hillary’s clinging to her guns. “I won, I won, I WON!” she keeps telling the press (small “P” on purpose until the MSM gets their act together) as she continues to attempt ramming her own “fuzzy math” down the rest of our throats…
From The New York Times:
As Time Runs Short, Clinton Claims Lead in Popular Vote
By PATRICK HEALY
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is entering the Kentucky and Oregon primaries on Tuesday with one of the most pugnacious political messages of her campaign: That she is ahead in the national popular vote when all votes are counted, including from the unsanctioned primaries in Michigan and Florida, and that party leaders who have a vote as super-delegates should reflect this level of appeal.
This argument is of a piece with Mrs. Clinton’s increasingly populist image, as a fighter on behalf of average people, but it is also a debatable claim: Most tallies of the national popular vote put Mr. Obama in the lead, especially when Michigan and Florida are not counted.
Mr. Obama has declared his own lead in the national vote and is solidly ahead in the overall delegate count, and he intends to use the results of the Kentucky and Oregon primaries to declare on Tuesday night that he has secured a majority of the pledged delegates from primaries and caucuses.
While that does not guarantee the nomination, his campaign argues that it is an important moment and crucial for superdelegates to consider as well.
Yet Mr. Obama does not plan to declare outright victory, his advisers say, because he does not want to appear to be pushing Mrs. Clinton out of the race. At this stage, his advisers say, he wants to treat her gracefully as a worthy Democratic fighter, not as a stubborn nemesis. …”
“Stubborn nemesis“, Mr. Obama? Try: “Enemy and opposer of the ingenious Democratic Republic form of government UNANIMOUSLY signed with the blood of our Founding Fathers”?
Hillary’s recent actions are nothing less than DISPICCABLE. Who gives a DAMN that the people of New York City, Los Angeles, Miami and Boston almost UNANIMOUSLY agree Hillary needs to be appointed to govern over the good folks of North Dakota? Or Alaska? Or any OTHER so-called “Red State” in our Union?
In “Hillary’s World”, DOOMASSES such as myself, in the aftermath of 9/11, who were screaming at the tops of their lungs to “turn Baghdad into a glass parking lot” would have prevailed. Would one have taken a show of hands on 9/12, on 9/13, Baghdad would, INDEED, have been nuked in the wake of our collective anger at the time.
Hillary; free word of advice: STOP whining about winning the popular vote (disputable, by the way) and embrace the MUCH more advisable and well-thought-out “Utopia” of our Founding Fathers versus YOUR “Mob-Rules-Free-For-All”. You LOST. Now, PLEASE….
… Just fade the hell AWAY.
***
Other Blogger Opinions: Wonkette; Andrew Sullivan of The Daily Dish; Sister Toljah (Right — If you can believe it in this case…); PoliBlog™; Comments From Left Field
The most recent example of sexism is demonstrated by the fact that remarks about Obama’s wife are unacceptable but it is very acceptable, even with the pundits glee, to attack Bill Clinton , Hillary’s spouse , who is a male and who has accomplished more in his lifetime than all the pundits put together. This includes , most of the MSNBC and CNN news pundits. I think they are jealous of Bill and Hillary Clinton because these news commentators contribution to society is so insignificant now that we can go to the internet for true facts. Jack D. Stephens, MD
A year ago I thought that no Republican candidate would have a chance in this Presidential election. But now, after the democrats have turned their primary cycle into a circus, even a weak Republican like McCain has a shot.
Thanks Dem’s
Obama’s already behaving like the presumptive Dem nominee and setting his sights on McCain. La Hill needs to buy a clue.
I was intrigued by the name of this website so I decided to make an assessment. Although I am not crazy about the content of this paticular article, I will be back for more.
I support Hillary Clinton’s bid wholeheartedly. It’s no lie that the MSM and her opponents have been trying to knock her out of the race ever since Iowa. I like her tenacity as opposed to Barack Obama’s lack of veracity. Is she perfect? Hell no, but she is definitely better than her opponent. I’ll take a determined policy wonk over the creepy “one we have been waiting for” any day of the week. I don’t like being told how or what to think. Barack can save his pschological mumbo jumbo for the weak minded. His empty rhetoric portends another presidency of trial and error. This is dangerous, and we don’t need another eight years of the Democratic version of George Bush.
correction above… “psychological” mumbo jumbo
Well said, and agree or disagree — Welcome to The Gun Toting Liberal — NOT an “oxymoron”