<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another GTL™ Open Post Wednesday: Scott Brown (R-MA) To Be Sworn Into The Senate On Thursday?  Colin Powell Reverses Opinion On DADT?  President Obama Apologizes To Harry Reid (D-NE) For &#8220;Las Vegas&#8221; Remark?  More Sarah Palin Hypocrisy Over Rahm Emanuel&#8217;s &#8220;Retard&#8221; Remark?  SOUND OFF HERE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guntotingliberal.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=7339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guntotingliberal.com/?p=7339</link>
	<description>Slightly Left Of Center... But Always On Target!!!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:51:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Lovell</title>
		<link>http://guntotingliberal.com/?p=7339#comment-51186</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Lovell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guntotingliberal.com/?p=7339#comment-51186</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-51182&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@F&amp;B&lt;/a&gt;, Don&#039;t forget the Padres, Cardinals, and Metropolitans.  And about a third of the cities and towns in California.  

Re; DADT - OK, so we scrap that, and let homosexuals (homo in this case meaning same, not man) of all stripes come out of the lockers and serve openly.  That would then open the door for all the housing, medical, etc. for their partners - so would then POOSSLQs also qualify for those same benefits?  

What happens when an openly gay service member (no jokes now!) gets passed over for promotion on purely performance grounds?  And then whines that the denial of promotion was because of being gay?  Now we have even more entitlement mentality, more time, money, and resources wasted on BS.  Will there be quotas? There has to be X (or Y) percentage of open gays in each of the (Big) O ranks?  

How about straights who may not want to shower with gays, and maybe be subject to being checked out? Do we set up gay barracks?  Or, do we just chuck it all, and go to unisex everything?  No differentiation at all?  (the bright side of that might be to get rid of those butt-ugly hats that get inflicted on the female members of the military).  This isn&#039;t just a can of worms that is being opened, but a whole damned firkin (puncheon), or maybe even a tun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-51182" rel="nofollow">@F&amp;B</a>, Don&#8217;t forget the Padres, Cardinals, and Metropolitans.  And about a third of the cities and towns in California.  </p>
<p>Re; DADT &#8211; OK, so we scrap that, and let homosexuals (homo in this case meaning same, not man) of all stripes come out of the lockers and serve openly.  That would then open the door for all the housing, medical, etc. for their partners &#8211; so would then POOSSLQs also qualify for those same benefits?  </p>
<p>What happens when an openly gay service member (no jokes now!) gets passed over for promotion on purely performance grounds?  And then whines that the denial of promotion was because of being gay?  Now we have even more entitlement mentality, more time, money, and resources wasted on BS.  Will there be quotas? There has to be X (or Y) percentage of open gays in each of the (Big) O ranks?  </p>
<p>How about straights who may not want to shower with gays, and maybe be subject to being checked out? Do we set up gay barracks?  Or, do we just chuck it all, and go to unisex everything?  No differentiation at all?  (the bright side of that might be to get rid of those butt-ugly hats that get inflicted on the female members of the military).  This isn&#8217;t just a can of worms that is being opened, but a whole damned firkin (puncheon), or maybe even a tun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The GTL™</title>
		<link>http://guntotingliberal.com/?p=7339#comment-51185</link>
		<dc:creator>The GTL™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guntotingliberal.com/?p=7339#comment-51185</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-51178&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@CLD&lt;/a&gt;, LMFAO, CLD!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-51178" rel="nofollow">@CLD</a>, LMFAO, CLD!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike 300 spartans</title>
		<link>http://guntotingliberal.com/?p=7339#comment-51184</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike 300 spartans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guntotingliberal.com/?p=7339#comment-51184</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-51177&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Doomed&lt;/a&gt;, I hear you buddy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-51177" rel="nofollow">@Doomed</a>, I hear you buddy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F&#38;B</title>
		<link>http://guntotingliberal.com/?p=7339#comment-51183</link>
		<dc:creator>F&#38;B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guntotingliberal.com/?p=7339#comment-51183</guid>
		<description>GTL: The source you cited regarding Sarah Palin&#039;s &quot;hypocrisy&quot; is worthless.

It never happened.

Not only is it 5th or 6th hand information at best, it is ultimately from a source that is worse than unreliable.  It is clear that Levi Johnston has decided to tell whatever lies suit his purpose, and this is just another Levi Johnston lie.

If Levi Johnston said that he heard Obama call his daughter &#039;retarded&#039; while campaigning, would you still believe him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GTL: The source you cited regarding Sarah Palin&#8217;s &#8220;hypocrisy&#8221; is worthless.</p>
<p>It never happened.</p>
<p>Not only is it 5th or 6th hand information at best, it is ultimately from a source that is worse than unreliable.  It is clear that Levi Johnston has decided to tell whatever lies suit his purpose, and this is just another Levi Johnston lie.</p>
<p>If Levi Johnston said that he heard Obama call his daughter &#8216;retarded&#8217; while campaigning, would you still believe him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F&#38;B</title>
		<link>http://guntotingliberal.com/?p=7339#comment-51182</link>
		<dc:creator>F&#38;B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guntotingliberal.com/?p=7339#comment-51182</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-51178&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@CLD&lt;/a&gt;, I still don&#039;t understand how the Saints made it to the Superbowl during the antichrist&#039;s administration.

Anyway, why hasn&#039;t the ACLU stepped in yet and demanded that the Saints change their name?  Too much of a religious overtone.

Maybe the &#039;Mullahs&#039;, or the &#039;Heathens&#039; would be accepted better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-51178" rel="nofollow">@CLD</a>, I still don&#8217;t understand how the Saints made it to the Superbowl during the antichrist&#8217;s administration.</p>
<p>Anyway, why hasn&#8217;t the ACLU stepped in yet and demanded that the Saints change their name?  Too much of a religious overtone.</p>
<p>Maybe the &#8216;Mullahs&#8217;, or the &#8216;Heathens&#8217; would be accepted better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F&#38;B</title>
		<link>http://guntotingliberal.com/?p=7339#comment-51181</link>
		<dc:creator>F&#38;B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guntotingliberal.com/?p=7339#comment-51181</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-51169&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Mike 300 spartans&lt;/a&gt;, OK, Mike, I see your reasoning, and in a perfect world it might work, but our world is not perfect.  If &#039;that homosexual&#039; did make a comment after seeing another soldier in the shower, or even further, make an unwelcome advance toward another soldier, the scenario becomes less workable.  In the case of a male soldier making an advance toward a female soldier, the female soldier can, and typically will, report the sexual harassment to a superior.  In the case of male on male sexual harassment, however, it would likely be handled differently.  If a male soldier reported that he had been sexually harassed by another male soldier, the report would likely be met with grins and giggles.  It is more likely that the straight male would want to take the matter into his own hands and beat the crap out of the offender.  Sometimes, he may get his buddies to help him with the task.  

Obviously, this could happen with or without DADT, but the DADT policy makes it less likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-51169" rel="nofollow">@Mike 300 spartans</a>, OK, Mike, I see your reasoning, and in a perfect world it might work, but our world is not perfect.  If &#8216;that homosexual&#8217; did make a comment after seeing another soldier in the shower, or even further, make an unwelcome advance toward another soldier, the scenario becomes less workable.  In the case of a male soldier making an advance toward a female soldier, the female soldier can, and typically will, report the sexual harassment to a superior.  In the case of male on male sexual harassment, however, it would likely be handled differently.  If a male soldier reported that he had been sexually harassed by another male soldier, the report would likely be met with grins and giggles.  It is more likely that the straight male would want to take the matter into his own hands and beat the crap out of the offender.  Sometimes, he may get his buddies to help him with the task.  </p>
<p>Obviously, this could happen with or without DADT, but the DADT policy makes it less likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunboat</title>
		<link>http://guntotingliberal.com/?p=7339#comment-51180</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunboat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guntotingliberal.com/?p=7339#comment-51180</guid>
		<description>The funniest line this year goes to a single line entry on InstaPundit.

&quot;Emmanuel Rahm compares Democrats to retards, apologizes to retards.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The funniest line this year goes to a single line entry on InstaPundit.</p>
<p>&#8220;Emmanuel Rahm compares Democrats to retards, apologizes to retards.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CLD</title>
		<link>http://guntotingliberal.com/?p=7339#comment-51178</link>
		<dc:creator>CLD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guntotingliberal.com/?p=7339#comment-51178</guid>
		<description>CLAP,CLAP,CLAP,CLAP..&quot;Which entity is it professing they plan to defeat our mighty saints, who might that be, who might that be&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CLAP,CLAP,CLAP,CLAP..&#8221;Which entity is it professing they plan to defeat our mighty saints, who might that be, who might that be&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doomed</title>
		<link>http://guntotingliberal.com/?p=7339#comment-51177</link>
		<dc:creator>Doomed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guntotingliberal.com/?p=7339#comment-51177</guid>
		<description>The deficit spending of Bush and now Obama and indeed forced upon America the idea that crisis is now upon us.

Why is the deficit a crisis.....it is a crisis because the INTEREST on the national debt is 500 billion per year and heading higher.  After this year it will be 621 billion per year.  After 2011 it will be 719 billion per year based upon projections and those projections along with our very distinguished government show no sign of being able to balance the budget or come anywhere NEAR balancing the budget.

Our federal government is unconstitutional.  It has usurped power that is not theirs, does not belong to them and has and was never the intent of the founders of this nation.  No where did the Founders invision the fed government as having the power to tell a state to give us money, then IF YOU DONT DO WHAT WE SAY.....we wont give it back to YOU.

How FFFing stupid is that.

You dont pass seatbelt laws......no federal tax dollars for you to fix your roads.....but you WILL fix your roads.

On and on and on this blackmail goes by the federal Hydra as it devours citizens income in the form of taxes, fees, and chrages for everything...now apparently the air we breathe as well.

Where is the libertarian outrage over this.....I dont give a flying flip whose in charge..the federal government is out of control.......

I saw a Billboard on the highway last night as I was travelling from the University of Wyoming back to Montana........

It simply said.

THE GOVERNMENT GONE WILD.

OUR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS OUT OF CONTROL people....OUT OF FFFING CONTROL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The deficit spending of Bush and now Obama and indeed forced upon America the idea that crisis is now upon us.</p>
<p>Why is the deficit a crisis&#8230;..it is a crisis because the INTEREST on the national debt is 500 billion per year and heading higher.  After this year it will be 621 billion per year.  After 2011 it will be 719 billion per year based upon projections and those projections along with our very distinguished government show no sign of being able to balance the budget or come anywhere NEAR balancing the budget.</p>
<p>Our federal government is unconstitutional.  It has usurped power that is not theirs, does not belong to them and has and was never the intent of the founders of this nation.  No where did the Founders invision the fed government as having the power to tell a state to give us money, then IF YOU DONT DO WHAT WE SAY&#8230;..we wont give it back to YOU.</p>
<p>How FFFing stupid is that.</p>
<p>You dont pass seatbelt laws&#8230;&#8230;no federal tax dollars for you to fix your roads&#8230;..but you WILL fix your roads.</p>
<p>On and on and on this blackmail goes by the federal Hydra as it devours citizens income in the form of taxes, fees, and chrages for everything&#8230;now apparently the air we breathe as well.</p>
<p>Where is the libertarian outrage over this&#8230;..I dont give a flying flip whose in charge..the federal government is out of control&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>I saw a Billboard on the highway last night as I was travelling from the University of Wyoming back to Montana&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>It simply said.</p>
<p>THE GOVERNMENT GONE WILD.</p>
<p>OUR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS OUT OF CONTROL people&#8230;.OUT OF FFFING CONTROL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://guntotingliberal.com/?p=7339#comment-51172</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 03:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guntotingliberal.com/?p=7339#comment-51172</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-51168&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@SJ&lt;/a&gt;,

RE: Scott Brown. I think that now that the supermajority has been pimp smacked, what we can hope will come from it is more fiscal responsibility. Because both sides can blame the other, my hope is that they&#039;ll have to do more. When the Democrats had a supermajority, the Republicans could blame them for EVERYTHING. Now, both parties can be equally blamed for the stuff that goes down in Washington.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-51168" rel="nofollow">@SJ</a>,</p>
<p>RE: Scott Brown. I think that now that the supermajority has been pimp smacked, what we can hope will come from it is more fiscal responsibility. Because both sides can blame the other, my hope is that they&#8217;ll have to do more. When the Democrats had a supermajority, the Republicans could blame them for EVERYTHING. Now, both parties can be equally blamed for the stuff that goes down in Washington.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
