Facts organized all in one location. Obama, New Party, Ayers, Dunn, Jennings, Jones, Sunstein, Jarrett, Lloyd, Wright, School Indoctrinations, Soros, Cop-Killers, Cuban Spy Rings, Commie Media, Misinformation, Congress Investigation, plus details on Socialist/Communist Members of Congress like Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank and over 80 others. Listen to Soviet Spy defector explain how communist takeovers are performed and Reagan’s guidance on dealing with Communists. Learn what a Socialist, Communist and Progressive is. Examine ACORN, SEIU’s and Union Communist leaders. See FBI files and testimonies. Catch up on Takeover News and study a Communist Takeover Plan from the 1960′s, along with how to resist. Videos, links, pdfs.

Commies can run, but they can’t hide! – http://www.commieblaster.com

The poor and the weary are not the friends of the Democrats and the Democrats are NOT the friends to poor people. Quite the opposite.

The Democratic party only needs poverty, weak, poor and downtrodden in this country to continue to be relevant. Because once the poor are NO longer poor then they are NO longer beholden to the system.

Let me repeat that.

Once the poor are NO longer poor they are no longer beholden to the system that keeps them perpetually poor.

Health care for all…the poor will still be poor.
Food Stamps………..The poor are still poor.
Housing……………The poor are still poor.
Busing…………….The poor are still poor.

Democrats might have other redeeming qualities but their perpetual infatuation with poverty and then doing absolutely NOTHING about it is disconcerting.

The GOP has the opportunity to go after poverty while the Democrats use poverty to make themselves relevant by making poverty comfortable.

They dont fix it. They make it more comfortable to be poor and therefore have no desire to move up and become reliant upon themselves instead of a system whose very existence is designed to keep them poor so that they are relevant.

The GOP has more of a solution then they realize…they just seem to think of poor people as diseased or something…Im not sure why the GOP has allowed themselves to be painted this way but I can tell you this.

Health care for poor people is another example of the Democrats MAKING POVERTY MORE COMFORTABLE.

And when we move on guess what…YEP…the poor will still be poor and Republicans will have been painted as HATERS OF THE POOR.

(grins evilly)

And look what I found:

THE OBAMA PC CLOWN CORPS HYMN

(sung to the tune of the “Marine Corps Hymn”)

From the Halls of Academia
To the Shores of Hope and Change;
We wont’t fight our country’s battles
Cause war is so deranged;
But we’ll fight for social justice
And to spread the wealth around;
We are proud to claim the title of
An Obama PC Clown.

Our progressive cause is all the rage
From dawn to setting sun;
And the dilly-dally dithering
Hides the barrel of our gun;
In the snow of far-off northern states
And in sunny southern towns;
You will find us always on the job–
Obama’s PC Clowns.

Here’s a toast to our great CIC
Who we are proud to serve!
And we’d stand up for our way of life
If we only had the nerve;
If Pelosi and the Democrats
Ever doffed their little crowns;
They would find their back are covered by
Obama’s PC Clowns.

Your missing the point here. This egregious behavior is to be expected from Democrats. They make no bones about being Marxist and socialists. They have no compunction to taking kickbacks, bribes and all manner of scummy back room dealings. See modern day Russia for an example of how the Marxist politicians worked their pork magic.

Thats the Democrats way.

But if someone stands up and rails against government handouts and then takes a few themselves in the ordinary custom of doing their business fairly and honestly then they are two faced, scum sucking hypocrits who most likely have roots in the Aryan movement.

For a democrat to be a scumbag is to be expected. Hell its totally within the bounds of necessity…see Harry Reid…. and there are no apologies needed. For a Republican to be less then rock solid is an egregious crime of galactic proportions.

One can only laugh at this article. They spend 2 pages railing against Ms. Bachman and then say oh but the Democrats do it too without even so much as a howdy do or indictment of any kind.

Democrats are expected to be crooks and cheats. Old news. The MSM just cant wait to dig up the dirt on a Republican though. Thats what they are doing here. Even though this is beyond silly since she is not taking welfare but is rather doing what the government asks her to do in NOT planting certain crops in order to keep the market propped up for that specific commodity.

Welfare….hardly…this is an example of the government exchanging a contract with a business partner. She could plant and could make most likely MORE money by not taking the subsidy. Silliness and a glib effort to alinskize Ms. Bachman.

Let’s look at the other side – Lynn Woolsey was a welfare queen. Babs “I’m too important to be called Ma’am” Boxer finagled a $20 million picnic shoulder for her sons company. Di “I’m important so I need a gun, you are just a commoner so you don’t” Feinstein funneled billions of dollers in business to the foreign companies her husband was an (unregistered) agent for.

In a “Will Wonders Never Cease” line, looks like some of the CNN staff is starting to wake up:

http://www.lineofdeparture.com/2009/12/21/tora-bora-hindsight/

The fact of the mat­ter is that in the rugged ter­rain of Tora Bora, the idea of seal­ing the bor­der is prob­lem­atic at best. Might the U.S. troops sta­tioned at key cross­ing points have picked bin Laden out from the other refugees flee­ing to Pakistan? Maybe, with some luck. Should the U.S. have tried harder? Probably. Would it have worked? Probably not.

In fact its easy to imag­ine a con­verse nar­ra­tive in which the pun­dits, in hind­sight, reflect on the fool­ish hubris of the U.S. think­ing it could cap­ture bin Laden by seal­ing a bor­der that has never been sealed. A Senate report, authored by a crit­ics of the admin­is­tra­tion, might, in this imag­i­nary sce­nario, have sug­gested a major oppor­tu­nity was missed to work with Afghan and Pakistani allies who knew the area, instead of using a heavy-​​handed American approach that alien­ated local afghans and moti­vated bin Laden sym­pa­thiz­ers to aid his escape.

But whether you are a pun­dit or politi­cian, the smart thing to do from a PR stand­point is to embrace con­ven­tional wis­dom when­ever it cal­ci­fies around a gen­er­ally accepted con­sen­sus. For your image and rep­u­ta­tion, it’s bet­ter to join it than to fight it. Arguing against the col­lec­tive judg­ment of all those smart peo­ple can make you look inflex­i­ble, and unwill­ing to face real­ity. But con­ven­tional wis­dom is so often, well, “con­ven­tional”, that is it’s over­sim­pli­fied and lack­ing in any seri­ous con­sid­er­a­tion of nuance or impon­der­ables. Still, if you just go with the col­lec­tive judg­ment of the pun­ditry, while you may not always be right, you’ll always be in good company.